SGLang vs vLLM: one setup, two speeds
When one request arrived a few milliseconds early, SGLang 0.5.20 made 3 requests wait, and total throughput fell by 40%. 637 runs, and the settings that close the gap.
Read the deep dive →You have made your hardware offering efficient. We measure what your machines deliver on real AI workloads, and help your clients get the most out of them.
Inference platforms and model API providers use the same GPUs as you, but earn larger margins and have more customers. They win them with the software they run on that hardware: tuned engines, settings and measured results.
Results from our open-model serving tests, with the versions we tested.
When one request arrived a few milliseconds early, SGLang 0.5.20 made 3 requests wait, and total throughput fell by 40%. 637 runs, and the settings that close the gap.
Read the deep dive →Quantization, KV cache, CUDA graphs, concurrency and speculative decoding, with accuracy measured alongside speed.
Inspect the benchmarks →From vLLM 0.28 through 0.31, MTP speculative decoding could repeat or skip tokens on hybrid models such as Qwen3.5. We traced the cause and tested a fix.
Read the investigation →Reach out and send us a note. We’ll take it forward from there.